An insight into the enigmatic Dr Peter Tannock (continued)

BC:
Let's now move on to Catholic universities. In the last interview
I had with you about six years ago I remember you telling me that
when you started this dream it was not to set up a university but
merely to establish a good Catholic Teachers' College in Western
Australia.
PT:
Yes, that was the trigger for Notre Dame. For years the Catholic
Education Commission had been struggling with the challenge of "how
are we going to provide enough people who are trained in the Catholic
tradition to teach in, and to lead, Catholic schools?" It was an
immense problem. We had in place arrangements - some of them through
the Catholic Institute (at Edith Cowan University as it is now)
that were modestly successful - but they were, in my view, relatively
token and piecemeal in comparison to the challenge we faced against
the booming demand for places in Catholic schools and the number
of teachers that needed to be trained. We couldn't possibly meet
the need.
In Eastern Australia the Church had a network of Catholic Teachers'
Colleges that had become Colleges of Advanced Education, fully funded
by the Commonwealth from the mid-1970s. We had nothing on the West
coast. So we looked at it and said " Well, OK, let's see if we can
do something?" - because we HAD to do something. We didn't have
any option. So that is what led to Notre Dame.
We started off with the idea of a Catholic Teachers' College. However,
all the pressure at the time in Australia in higher education was
to move away from single-purpose institutions. It was only a few
years later that the Federal Education Minister, John Dawkins, turned
all the CAE's into Universities. That pressure was on already. We
were also strongly influenced by Notre Dame in the United States.
By the way it wasn't my initiative that led to the involvement of
Notre Dame in the US. Dennis Horgan knew the brother of the former
President of Notre Dame, Fr Theodore Hesburgh, and through him we
heard he was coming to Fremantle on the QEII. That's how it happened…
BC: Seredipity…
PT: It was - very, very fortuitous.
BC: I want to ask you some things
about the connection with Notre Dame in a moment but, when you started
out, the thing that I find people who are knowledgeable of these
things are in awe of is that soon after you started it was revealed
that this Archdiocese was in deep financial difficulties.
PT: I honestly do not know how
we did it. The only thing you can say is that it was the Holy Spirit.
We shouldn't get too carried away with ourselves - I keep saying
to people, and I know it's right, we're still not a mature institution
by any means. We've got a long way to go and the struggle goes on.
We are past the perilous "childhood" stage now though. We're into
our "gangling adolescence" and it's pretty healthy and pretty promising.
But it was difficult. The 90s were a particularly difficult time
for us and the Archdiocese especially financially.
BC: Were the problems ever of
such magnitude that they threatened what you were doing here?
PT: We have had two outstanding
Archbishops who have been responsible for this place, Archbishop
Foley and Archbishop Hickey. Archbishop Foley died, unfortunately,
just a year after we had received legislative backing from the West
Australian Parliament. Bishop Healy was the Administrator for a
while and then Archbishop Hickey took over. Bishop Healy was a great
supporter and gave us our canonical statute, even when the financial
problems overshadowed us.
I think Archbishop Hickey has done a magnificent job for both the
Archdiocese and for Notre Dame. He pulled it all together and turned
everything around financially and in other ways in a relatively
unsung fashion. That will be to his everlasting credit. Through
it all, he has also been a magnificent supporter of this place.
He never flinched…
BC: What is the actual relationship
these days between the institutional Church and a Catholic University?
Is there a financial connection or are you independent?
PT:
We're independent but, of course, we would never be where we are
without the financial and other support the institutional Church
gave us and continues to give us through gifts and loans. This University
had four major foundation benefactors. They were the Catholic Archdiocese
of Perth, the Catholic Education Commission of Western Australia,
the Sisters of St John of God and the University of Notre Dame in
the US. The first three put up large sums of money in the early
days to provide us with the ability to acquire the property and
do the developments that enabled us to start. Without that we couldn't
have done it. The University of Notre Dame in the United States
was immensely important also. They provided people, intellectual
property and reputation which was also part of the founding equation.
Without them we would not have got off the ground or survived.
BC: Well it seems Cardinal Pell
is attracted to the name Notre Dame and he's invited you to Sydney.
This is what has come out of left field and blown everybody's mind
and is what has led to this interview. What is happening here?
PT: About 18 months or two years
ago in our strategic planning for the future we came to the view
that a study centre in Sydney would be an interesting thing for
us to do. We got the idea from Notre Dame in the United States.
They have study centres in London, Dublin, Rome and various places
which provide their students with "study abroad" experiences. This
adds to the value, the quality and diversity of their education.
We thought that would be an interesting thing for us to do. But
not in another country. In Sydney. Why Sydney? Because it's "the
big smoke"; because a lot of our students finish up working there
- our lawyers and business students and so on; because we thought
it would be a good opportunity for students acquiring practical
experience during a degree in schools, hospitals, law firms, accounting
firms and so on. It would add value to what they were doing here.
We thought it would be quite attractive to our international students,
particularly the American students who come here, to have a "Sydney
experience" as part of their time at Notre Dame. So that's what
was behind the idea initially.
We talked to Cardinal Pell and his senior people about the idea.
He came back to us and said, "I can see it would be good for you
but I would like you to go one step further. I'd like you to consider
establishing a campus in Sydney. And if you will do that I have
a site in mind that could be used for this purpose." He said, "My
motivation is that you are doing things in some areas that I am
particularly interested in. I do hear continuing good reports of
your university but I am particularly interested in some things
that you are doing that probably only you can do."
BC: And what are they?
PT: Medicine is one. We take
our first medical students in Fremantle next year - He said he would
be keen to have a Catholic Medical School on the East coast of Australia.
BC: Well Catholic Health is
the other significant part of the Church in Australia today, besides
Catholic Education, experiencing phenomenal growth…
PT: The other thing he said
he was very interested in was the Notre Dame Law School. The great
profession of Law produces leaders and all sorts of other people
who are very influential in society. He thought a Catholic Law School
would be a wonderful thing for Sydney.
BC: So, as you would see it
the Cardinal has a vision for a diversity of Catholic higher educational
institutions - after all he's come in for some veiled criticism
of this invitation to you - he's already committed to Campion College
- a more conservative, liberal-arts institution…
PT: Campion is in the Parramatta
Diocese. We're also very supportive of them. My view, and I think
the Cardinal's view, on Catholic Higher Education can be summed
as "let a thousand flowers bloom". He has the same attitude to Catholic
higher education as we've long had in this country to Catholic primary
and secondary education: The more the better!
Just look at the diversity fostered by all the different religious
orders across this country with their different charisms. The only
problem with Catholic higher education is that we've taken a long,
long time to get going in Australia. Basically, the Church in Australia
- for good reason - put all of its eggs in the primary and secondary
education basket for 150 years except for the few religious orders
who established teachers' colleges on the East coast. The assumption
for much of that time was that the religious orders would go on
forever and that they would look after their own training needs.
Having said that, we should remember that the idea of a Catholic
University in Australia is not new. Cardinal Gilroy tried very hard
to establish a University as a branch of Notre Dame in Indiana,
in Sydney in 1946. Between 1946 and 1954 he spent eight years pushing
it. He had the priests from Notre Dame out here in Sydney but eventually
it fell over for various political reasons including, probably,
the Sydney-Melbourne rivalry.
CONTINUED [use navigation below]...
This interview was published in OnLine Catholics under the pen name Tom Scott.
©2005Tom Scott/Brian Coyne/Vias Tuas Communications
Published: 5Aug2004



